Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 23, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime against viewing public officials: (a) at the 2nd floor traffic administration department and office office in Chungcheongnam-nam, the Defendant sent the victim E (37 years of age) a notice of a fine for negligence not to subscribe to the mandatory insurance of two-wheeled automobiles by registered mail; (b) at night, the victim E (37 years of age) who is a public official in charge of the crime committed a crime against viewing public officials: (c) was found to have taken one time to walk on the floor; (d) was spited on the floor; (d) the victim was spited on the floor; and (e) the victim was spited with the victim’s face on one occasion; and (e) the victim was asked at the victim’s left 13 years of age, who is a public official in charge of the victim and the victim’s 4 years of age, who is a public official in charge of the victim.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of the victims, who are viewing public officials, and at the same time, engaged in injuries such as salt, tension, etc. to victims E in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the following parts of the sale that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to victims F, respectively.
2. The Defendant committed a crime against a police officer: (a) was assaulted against a viewing public official at the time, time, and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph; (b) was notified of the victim H (55 years old) who was an official belonging to the D police station G district unit at the site after receiving a report of 112, to arrest a flagrant offender due to the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) was informed of the victim’s right to refuse to make statements and right to appoint a defense counsel; and (d) the victim’s defect likely to take the
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 Report case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the defendant injured the victim by opening a shoulder that requires medical treatment for about a week.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement of E;
1.Each of F, H, and I.