A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while serving as E in the accounts of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Bureau, is working as the head of the Gyeonggi-gu branch of the Korea Public Officials Trade Union D, and the victim F(the age of 61) is a member of the Committee on General Economic Affairs as a member of the D City Council.

D City Council had conducted a regular audit of administrative affairs from November 20, 2015, and conducted the audit of general affairs and administrative affairs belonging to the Safety Administration Bureau around November 24, 2015.

1. On November 26, 2015, around 10:00, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) was placed in the council room next to the office of audit of the administrative affairs of the 3rd floor in G; (b) was placed in the permanent office of education, which is a permanent office where the said office is located in order to prepare the administrative audit of the Korea Broadcasting and Economy Bureau; and (c) on November 24, 2015, the victim’s questioning related to the above administrative affairs audit was put in office; and (d) on November 24, 2015, the victim was serving as the victim’s left chest one time, and the victim’s part, etc. was placed at the end of selling and selling.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the audit of administrative affairs of the victim, and at the same time, the victim was a scarbing room which requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. On November 24, 2015, the victim of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) demanded an explanation on the grounds why a specific public official is in a long-term state of non-permanent position in the process of auditing general affairs and administrative affairs belonging to the Korea Coast Guard, and requested an explanation as to whether there are such special reasons, such as disturbance of privacy or drinking, etc., and explained that H of the Director of the Korea Coast Guard would be due to temporary retirement, etc.

In addition, the victims are above the top level in the process of questioning whether the total duties and assignment of a specific public official are preferential.