Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 1 year for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:30 on September 20, 2013, Defendant A acquired a set of gallon jus in the market price of KRW 900,000 from a substitute engineer in the name-free distance of the tea hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 30,000 won with knowledge that it is a stolen goods.

2. Defendant B

A. At around 02:30 on September 21, 2013, the Defendant acquired stolen goods from a taxi engineer on his name in the radio wave of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu, by purchasing a total of two handphones, such as a gallon ju S2 Handphone in the market price equivalent to KRW 900,000, and a total of gallon 8,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 900,00,000, even though he knew that it is a stolen goods, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 50,00,000.

B. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (AD) are the defendants engaged in driving automobiles.

On April 5, 2014, at around 04:25, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.129% in blood, and proceeded at a speed of about 80km in Si speed according to the two-lanes of Si/Gu Dong-gu, Daegu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, 176 (Sacheon-dong), Dong-gu, dong-gu, Daegu, with effective, underground map from the four-lanes of Dong-si to the four-lanes of city.

At the time, it is night, and at the same time, it is an intersection, so the driver has a duty of care to live well in the front line and to operate the brake and steering gear accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was negligent in failing to properly operate the operation and steering gear of the dong and steering gear in the front of the vehicle in front of that vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant following the FNF stations of the Victim E (Age 55) who was stopped in accordance with the stop signal at the front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence for approximately two weeks to the victim.