logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.03.21 2012고단2827
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and by a fine of four million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Criminal facts

From the Haman on August 2012, 2012, the Defendant posted contact information along with an advertisement that purchased or lost mobile phones on the Internet portal site, and then sold the mobile phone from many unspecified people, the Defendant was in contact with the Defendant to sell the mobile phone from the unspecified people. The Defendant purchased it closely or purchased it to dispose of it to other stolen business operators.

On October 13, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 100,00,00, even though he/she knew of the fact that he/she had stolen from F in the vicinity of sexual investigative distance near Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, the market price of the victim G, which he/she owned, was 90,000 won.

The Defendant, even though he knew of the fact that his cellular phone that he stolen from F from around 201 to October 31, 2012, was stolen, he purchased five times as shown in the annexed List of Offenses and acquired stolen objects.

Defendant A is a person who professionally purchased stolen or lost mobile phones (Defendant B and A) and Defendant B plays a role in purchasing the stolen or lost mobile phones at the direction of Defendant A, and the Defendants are punished.

Defendant

B around October 14, 2012, around 07:30 on 07:30 on 14, 2012, only one gallon jus jus jus jus jus jus jus 3 mobile phones equivalent to 900,000 won in the market price of the victim I who was stolen by him, and one galth jus jus 2 mobile phones jus jus jus 847,000 won in the market price owned by the victim J, and one jus jus jus jus 2 mobile phones jus jus jus 1,00 won in the victim K, with the knowledge that the price is each stolen, and then acquired 580,000 won in the price and delivered it to the defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolen goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with regard to F;

1. Each statement of G, L, M, I, H, N, andO.

arrow