A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2, 2014, from around 22:30 to 22:50, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by: (a) having the victim E talked “D” in the Gangnam-gu Seoul building; and (b) having the victim E talked, “chrone, chrone, chrone, chrone, chrone, chrone,” and having the victim go against the disturbance on the floor, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On December 2, 2014, at around 23:00, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by assaulting that G, a police officer, who is a police officer of the Seoul Western Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 that it interferes with the work at the place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, to the effect that G, a police officer of the Seoul Western Police Station, “it should not take the direction so that it might take place.” The Defendant, a police officer, who is a police officer of the Seoul Western Police Station, assaulted the Defendant by assaulting the Defendant at the right right edge of the said G, “I would have been dint of the police spawn and walked

3. Around 23:10 on December 2, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and carried out as a police box located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. Around December 2, 2014, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim G, a police officer, by saying, “I received money from the police officer,” and speaking as a large interest, such as “The victim, who was a police officer, was frighted.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1), 136(1), and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing [determination of sentence] under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the grounds for suspended sentence”) is that there is no obstruction of the performance of official duties, obstruction of the performance of official duties, coercion of Type 1 (the person who has been specially punished) [the scope of recommendation] [the person who has been sentenced to imprisonment with labor].