A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:20 on February 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s demand that the victim E, a police official under safe guard of the Defendant, who was arrested on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act within the Manyang-si C and D Zone D area, will escape tobacco; (b) the Defendant may cut off the Defendant’s legitimate execution of public duties by walking the victim’s mother-and-child at one time through the victim’s left side, i.e., he can do so. the Defendant: (c) bottles, she can do so; (d) she can do so; (d) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; (e) she can do so; and (e) she can do so by walking on the left side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (CCTV on the page);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) (the decision of sentence] - The defendant recognizes and reflects the crimes.