1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 29, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years and six months in the Daejeon District Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 6, 2015.

Defendant

B On July 30, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on August 3, 2015, which became final and conclusive on August 3, 2015. On November 8, 2015, the Seoul Detention Center completed the enforcement of the sentence.

Defendant

C On May 25, 2016, upon being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on July 12, 2016, the date of the final judgment written in the indictment on July 12, 2016, “ July 27, 2016” was clearly written in writing, and thus, the correction was made.

The judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 2971

1. Defendant B’s joint criminal act (E) is an unemployed owner E in Seo-gu, Daejeon. Defendant C purchased a copy of another person’s identification card used to forge an application for joining a mobile phone from the Incheon G, and then delivers it to B. Defendant A, who is in charge of office management, etc., planned to forge an application for joining a mobile phone under the name of another person by forging an application for joining a mobile phone under the name of another person by using forged personal identification card information.

A. On July 11, 2013, the Defendants signed the document forgery “H”, “H”, “I”, “I”, “Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan CityJ”, and “the applicant column”, using a forged resident registration certificate that Defendant C had sought at the above E office, to the customer name column of the application for these mobile phone purchase.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge an application for joining a mobile phone in the name of H, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

In addition, the Defendants conspired with each other from around that time to July 26, 2013.