beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,637,979 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 14, 2013 to April 27, 2017.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) On October 14, 2013, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant’s C Hospital that was operated by the Defendant, knee-free scare-free scare-free scare-free scare-free scare-free scare-free.
(2) The Defendant fixed the part of the surgery to the side. Since then, the Plaintiff complained of the pain of the outer side without the right side.
(3) The examination results show that the Plaintiff’s opinion on the astronomical Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal Maternal.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and the result of the court's request for the examination of medical records to the Korean Medical Association, the result of the court's request for physical examination to the director of the Daejeon Gllon University, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The Defendant, when fixing the parts of the surgery as the parts of the surgery, neglected to observe the symptoms of the patient in order to determine whether to pressure the surgery, but neglected to observe the symptoms of the patient, and caused non-competence by pressure on the part of the Plaintiff’s surgery. Thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the above negligence.
C. The Plaintiff’s argument regarding the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s negligence suffered from a chronic disorder in the right stoves. However, the examination of medical records shows that the symptoms other than the stoves disease are likely to be the symptoms of the complex stoves, and that the causes of such symptoms are not revealed accurately, and that the DNA Rehabilitation Special Hospital that provided the Plaintiff from November 19, 2013 to April 15, 2014 may also have symptoms of the complex s to the Plaintiff. In full view of the circumstances, the Plaintiff presented an opinion to the effect that the Plaintiff may have symptoms of the multiple stoves.