logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.25 2017나2066405
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the claims extended by this court are dismissed.

2. The appeal cost and this court.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance as to this case are stated are as follows, except for the addition of the following '2. Additional Judgment' as to the allegations emphasized or added by the plaintiffs in this court, and therefore, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiffs asserted to the effect that the medical personnel of Defendant Hospital was negligent in causing mass transfusions due to unreasonable removal during the instant primary surgery, but the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the above evidence, the appraiser of the first instance medical association presented the opinion that "the possibility of blood or blood damage is very low in the course of the operation," and that "the plaintiff A's marinal symptoms appear to have deteriorated rapidly rather than the error of surgery treatment," and as alleged by the plaintiffs, it is difficult to conclude that mass transfusion caused by negligence during the surgery of the medical team of the defendant hospital is the cause of plaintiff A's marine, etc.

B. The plaintiffs asserted that the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital did not properly diagnose the blood species that occurred during the instant first surgery or did not promptly remove the blood species generated during the Plaintiff’s surgery due to the Plaintiff’s breach of its duty of care due to its progress observation. However, the evidence alone submitted by the plaintiffs is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the above evidence and the result of the medical record appraisal entrusted to the Director of the K Medical Center for the first instance trial, the appraisal by the K Medical Association for the first instance trial can be suspected of engaging in cT or MRI in an emergency, and the cause of pressure due to an emergency operation should be removed, if the 'the diagnosis by the K Medical Center for the first instance LI' seems to have a new or new psychotropic symptoms after the instant first operation.

arrow