1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

【The results of this Court’s entrustment of the evaluation of the medical records to the E Hospital Head of this Court’s E Hospital Head of the 4th 5th 5th 【The results of this Court’s entrustment of the evaluation of the medical records to E Hospital Head of this Court’s E Hospital Head of this Court’s E Hospital and D Hospital’s fact-finding.

4. Following the "the fact that the results of the 11th trial coincides with the results of the 11th trial", "the medical record appraisal shows the opinion that the 5th left side of the plaintiff and the 1,000 Malutal pressure is severe, which is judged to be a rapid exploitation due to the reduction of the height of conical signboards rather than pressure caused by hydronuclear escape symptoms, and that it is judged to be a rapid exploitation due to the reduction of the height of conical signboards rather than pressure caused by hydronuclear escape. ④ In the response to the inquiry of the fact-finding of the plaintiff, the D Hospital physician F, who performed the Megical and hydronuclear removal in the 11th trial, was taking the lead of the change of salutism in the plaintiff's own salutic image on the conical drilling, but it is reasonable to expect the aggravation of the salutic escape symptoms after the accident to the effect that there is a proximate causal causal relation between the plaintiff's 1st century and the Seoul Hospital's opinion that it is clear."