1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the remaining parts as described in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The part to be mard;

A. The sixth to seventeen parts of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cut to the following.

In the classification of risk group of Madneopty chloaks, spine operation is one of the most dangerous factors, but spine operation outside species is classified as low-risk group. The K Association’s appraisal of spine, other than species, provides that the risk of Madneopty chloaks, at the time of the enforcement of the Pharmaceutical Act, shall take precedence over the mechanical prevention by pressing pressure or pressure pressure, and thus, the Madne stale wearing can be determined as preventive measures against the deceased, and that the Madne cloak is the main risk of Madneopy and Madneopty chloaks. Since the walking condition after the operation is the first one of the risks of Madneopty chloaks and Madnecopty chloaks, the K Association presented its opinion that early walking will assist the deceased, and that the 20th anniversary of the Madneopty chlothy operation was not implemented for 20 days after the operation of Madne.

B. On or after August 9, 2015, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding whether there was negligence in the medical treatment of the defendant hospital (recognition of negligence in the medical examination and the duty to explain) shall be as follows. “After August 9, 2015, the treatment of the defendant hospital shall be conducted as follows.”