logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.08.21 2018누45116
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance was examined again along with the plaintiff's assertion.

Therefore, the reasoning for this case is that the court in this case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "vocational disturbance" of the first instance No. 3, the "Vocational disturbance" of the first instance judgment No. 11, the "No. 14," the "No. 1, 2007" of the first instance judgment No. 14, the "Gusan Construction Co., Ltd." of the second half of the same face No. 21, the "Gusan Construction Co., Ltd." of the fourth face No. 1, the "new union" of the fourth face No. 3 and fourth face No. 4, the "written statement" of the same face No. 5, No. 19, No. 6, the second face No. 2, the first face No. 17, and No. 7, the "this court" of the same face No. 14, the "No. 2, 2007" of the same face No. 5, and the "No. 10, the presumption No. 101," of the "No. 1," of the judgment. 8.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow