logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.17 2018누30497
고엽제후유증환자 등급판정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is that the court of first instance is "hovascular disease" in the first instance judgment No. 2, 19, 3, 20, 3, 21, 21, 4, 7, and 1, 4, 5, 5, and 18 of the first instance judgment, and 4, "this court" in the first instance court as "hovascular disease" in the second, 4, 11, 4, 5, 5, and 15, 20, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, and 10, 4, 10, 4, 10, 4, and 15, "the plaintiff's argument" in the second, 20, 10, 300, and 4,000, 4,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00,00.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow