logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.05.15 2018누36518
계약해지및위탁인정제한등처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the defendant at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance, which accepted the plaintiff's claim, is recognized as legitimate even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the defendant's

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case by the court is as follows: (a) No. 2 of the first instance judgment No. 7 of the first instance court’s 2015 “No. 27, Aug. 14, 2016”; (b) “3D remodeling” of the first instance court’s 9; (c) “No. 1, 3, and 20” of the third 8; (d) “No. 1, 3, and 13, and 14” of the fourth 4th 13 and 14; (d) “the instant disposition” of the first 14th 5th 14th ; and (e) “the 5th 10th eth eth 10th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.).

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow