A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 12, 2013, around 18:00, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 90,000, even though he/she knows that a single gallon-2 smartphone owned by the victim, whose name cannot be known from a person who was unable to know his/her name in front of the new forest basin in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Guro-gu, 460-26, he/she purchased at KRW 800,000 of the market price, which is the victim’s possession.

2. On December 12, 2013, the Defendant purchased 100,000 won from a person who was unable to know his/her name on the street in front of the Seoyang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, from a person who was unable to know his/her name on the street, and acquired 1,00,000 won of 60,000 won of 10,000 won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession where his/her name cannot be known.

3. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 120,000, knowing that he/she was a stolen, even though he/she was aware of the fact that his/her name was obtained from a person who was unable to know his/her name in front of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, and that he/she was the victim-owned market price of KRW 900,000.

4. On December 2013, the Defendant acquired one unit of gallon-2 smartphone in the market value equivalent to 800,000 won, which is the victim’s market value, where it is difficult to know the name he/she acquired from F at the same place as that of the middle and long-term microphone in which he/she acquired from F, with the knowledge that it is a stolen.

5. On January 2014, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 50,000 after being aware of the fact that he/she was a stolen goods, even though he/she was unable to know his/her name from a person who was unable to know his/her name at the same place as that of the mid- and long-term microphone 1 at the victim’s market price, which is equivalent to KRW 840,000.

6. On April 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on April 14, 201, the fact that the Defendant is a principal of a gallon-2 smartphone in the market value equivalent to 800,000 won, which is the victim’s ownership, where his/her name cannot be known from a person who was unable to know his/her name in front of the Gangnam-gu Office of Samsungdong 1