Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Criminal facts

In order to open a true mobile phone, the Defendant was issued a resident registration certificate (resident registration number : C) of B by making a false statement that he/she intends to find employment to B, who is a mental retardation.

1. In order to open a mobile phone by the Defendant on official document or unlawful uttering, the Defendant:

(a) around December 1, 201, in the manner of presenting B’s resident registration certificates delivered in advance to persons involved in the agency at the agency’s office located in Do Government-si D mobile phone located therein as above:

B. Around January 10, 2012, at the Government-si mobile phone agency of the first floor in E-building, each official document used the resident registration certificate illegally by presenting the resident registration certificate of B, which was received in advance, to the persons involved in the agency.

2. The Defendant, on the charge of forging a private document or uttering of a private document, has the intention to use the mobile phone to open the private document.

A. The date and time stated in Paragraph 1(a) and at the place of mobile phone application, and the mobile phone name “B” refers to “B”, “C” and “resident registration number” as “B” and “B” indicated in the Gyeonggi-do Government City Finance (referred to as “G building 202-1001 in Gyeonggi-do Government Government in the indictment” as “B” and “applicant” as “B” and indicated in the B’s name as if the agent was a document duly formed.

B. Upon receiving a new application for a mobile phone from a mobile phone at the date and time and place specified in paragraph (1)(b), “B”, “C”, and “resident registration number” indicated in “B”, “resident registration number” as “B” and “B” in “G building 202 1001” and “applicant” as “B” and subsequently suggesting that the agency is a document duly formed by the relevant person. In addition, a new application for a mobile phone under the name of “B”, which is a private document related to each right and duty, was forged and exercised.

3. The Defendant was guilty;

(a) a person involved in a mobile phone agency who is aware of the date and time set forth in paragraph 1(a) and at the place that the said new application is a forged private document;