beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 2015, the Defendant: (a) was stolen by taking advantage of the gaps 50,000 won in cash, the victim F, who is a patient in the same sick room, was in the absence of locking; (b) one of the victims of a MF 100,000 won in the market price that includes a private document forgery and a driver’s license; and (c) the use of a falsified document. 2. The use of a falsified document and a falsified document
A. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant, without authority, stated “F” in the applicant column in order to open a mobile phone in the name of F, using the F’s resident registration certificate that was stolen as prescribed in paragraph (1), and submitted to employees G who did not know that it was forged in the name, thereby forging an application for membership in the name of F, and subsequently using it as if he/she were the genuine application for membership.
B. On December 10, 2015, at the I mobile phone store located in Pyeongtaek-si H, the Defendant, without authority, stated “F” in the column for a new service contract to open a mobile phone in the F’s name, using the F’s resident registration certificate without authority, as stated in paragraph (1) of the said Article, and stated “F” in the column for a member of the service contract in order to open a mobile phone in the F’s name without authority, and submitted it as “F” in the name, address, Gyeonggi-si J apartment No. 805, 107, and 805, and signed by the name, thereby forging a new service contract in the F’s name, and subsequently, submitted it to K as if the new service contract was duly formed.
3. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud at the LGU flus store located in Pyeongtaek-dong 297-2, Pyeongtaek-dong, Pyeongtaek-dong on December 12:30, 2015, the Defendant submitted a forged application as referred to in paragraph 2(a) to the victim as if he/she were an applicant for a genuine membership, and submitted it to the victim as if he/she was the applicant for a genuine membership. 5. Dogno.