A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is in a relationship between B and wife, and each other.

The defendant living together with B, and helps C operated by B to work, using the situation in which B's resident registration certificates, physical cards, etc. can be easily carried in B's resident registration certificates, physical cards, etc., he opened a mobile phone in B's name, and thought it to be used with loans.

1. Crimes related to mobile phones;

A. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for mobile phone entry and had been at least at the same time, even though he/she did not have received any delegation of authority from E located in Gu Government-Si D;

The term “B” and “B” were written in the customer list column in the application form for a new Moble.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application for joining a mobile phone in the name of private document B, which is a private document concerning rights and duties.

B. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in Section 1-A, and at the same time and place, submitted an application for new mobile phone membership to F of the aforementioned mobile phone agent who knew of such fact to F of the said mobile phone agent as if they were duly formed.

(c)

The criminal defendant presented the above-mentioned resident registration certificate of the victim F, an operator of the above-mentioned mobile phone, with the head of one application for subscription to the mobile phone and the right to open the mobile phone from B, and applied for the opening of the mobile phone in the name of B, i.e., payment of the mobile phone fees, etc., regardless of whether he/she has no legitimate authority to open the mobile phone under the name of B.

In other words, even though the defendant received a mobile phone from the injured party and let the injured party open the mobile phone, he did not pay 2,923,840 won of the mobile phone price and communication fee.