logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1990. 5. 8. 선고 89다카29129 판결
[구상금][공1990.7.1.(875),1245]
Main Issues

The order of offsetting negligence and offsetting profit and loss

Summary of Judgment

If a loss occurs due to a tort, which causes a loss, and at the same time causes a loss, and if the loss shall be offset by negligence due to negligence on the victim, the above profit shall be deducted from the amount of damage calculated first, after offsetting the negligence.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 763 and 396 of the Civil Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Gyeong, Attorneys Park Jae-soo et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Plaintiff-Appellee

International Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. and seven plaintiffs, Counsel for the defendant-appellant-appellee)

Defendant-Appellant

Hyundai Merchant Shipping Co., Ltd., Ltd., Counsel for the defendant-appellant-appellee and 2 others

original decision

Seoul High Court Decision 89Na10441 Decided October 6, 1989

Text

The case shall be remanded to Seoul High Court by destroying the part against the defendant among the original judgment.

Reasons

As to the Grounds of Appeal:

According to the judgment of the court below, in calculating the amount of damages of the injured party caused by the accident of this case, the court below can find out that the injured party's fault should be deducted from the amount of damages calculated first, and then, the injured party's fault should be offset again. However, if the injured party's fault should be offset as well as the injured party's loss occurred, and the injured party's loss should be reduced as a result of negligence, the court below should deduct the above profit from the amount of damages calculated first (see Supreme Court Decision 73Da337 delivered on October 23, 1973). Thus, the court below's above judgment of the court below is erroneous in calculating the amount of damages, and this constitutes a ground for reversal of the judgment under Article 12 (2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings before being amended by Act No. 4203 delivered on January 13,

Therefore, the part against the defendant in the original judgment shall be reversed, and the case shall be remanded to the court below for a new trial and determination. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Kim Yong-ju (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1989.10.6.선고 89나10441
-서울고등법원 1991.4.19.선고 90나21812
참조조문