logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.02.19 2019고단2185
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date of confirmation of each judgment against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s main point of “D” located in Jeju Island on July 19, 2019, and “two persons are wicked by disease” from “D” located in Jeju Island on July 23:55, 2019,” and “one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one hundred and one

청을 받았음에도 위 경사 F에게 "짭새 새끼야 비도 오는데 태워달라, 짭새면 다냐 씨발놈들아 개새끼들아”라고 욕설을 하며 머리로 위 경사 F의 턱 부위를 1회 가격하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 notification processing.

2. On July 20, 2019, at around 00:0, the Defendant: (a) arrested a police officer slope F of the Jeju East Police Station E zone located in the Jeju East Police Station for the reason as stipulated in paragraph (1); (b) arrested a flagrant offender for the same reason as that of paragraph (1); and (c) 16, the Defendant sent the patrol vehicle to the Jeju East Police Station E zone; and (d) sent the above police officer a bath to “clamf because he is unfasible, if he is arrested, or if he is forced to go to move to the E zone in the Jeju East Police Station E zone,” and obstructed the above police officer from departing from the patrol vehicle by stopping the front of the patrol vehicle for about five minutes; and (e) placing the antenna patrol attached to the between the trokes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendant A with reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence: The degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not less than that of a fine for violent crimes in 198, and there is no other criminal record except that of a fine in 198.

arrow