logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.12 2018가합100179
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 159,544,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 16, 2018 to June 12, 2019.

Reasons

A. We need to objectively determine in light of the specific content and the principle of good faith.

(1) A construction work statement attached to the construction contract of this case (hereinafter “instant construction work statement”) is acknowledged (see Supreme Court Decision 97Da44768 delivered on December 23, 1997).

The name and size of reinforced concrete construction are as follows. The plaintiff completed the 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation project, including the name of reinforced concrete construction, specification, non-installation installation, and 2th installation of a steel-frame 10th installation project, including steel-frame construction of steel-frame 10th, 20th installation, 7th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation project, 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation project, 20th installation of a steel-frame 4th installation project, 7th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation project, 20th installation of a steel-frame 4th installation project, 7th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation project, 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation of a steel-frame 20th installation.

arrow