A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2015, at around 02:26, the Defendant reported 112 the content that “A person is aboard a motor vehicle,” and sought to return home from the victim E and the victim F, who is a police officer belonging to the Daejeon Police Station D District Unit of the Daejeon Police Station D District, which called “A person on a motor vehicle,” and called “Isssn. Isn the head of the Seoul Police Station, Isn't am. If Isn't am, Isn't am. Isn't am. Isn't am, Isn't am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (Attachment of a copy of work log and a photograph of damaged public officials);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty: Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (it shall be taken into consideration when there is no criminal record of the same kind of power or the suspension of execution);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;