1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,800,000 as well as its annual rate from June 24, 2014 to June 17, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an individual who runs the communications system, gold manufacturing, and sales business with the trade name of “C” in the Ocheon-gu, Busan. The actual operation of the above C is D, the husband of the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendant Company was designated as the first-class supplier by subscribing to bid for main loan system facilities to be installed in the apartment complex to be constructed by Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Treatment Construction”), and 60% of the quantity and quantity of the goods to be supplied to the Defendant Company, which was selected as the first-class supplier in the design sector (hereinafter “Datetetetetetetete”) and the remainder, as a collaboration form for the supply of the goods by division.

C. D around January 2013, around the introduction of Defendant Company, D continued contact with Defendant Company Fbu G and Hbu Vice Minister I for the blocking machine, vehicle number recognition machine, and development and supply of each case of each power plant, which is supplied to the above treatment Construction after the introduction of Defendant Company.

The Plaintiff, at the request of the Defendant Company, responded to, or submitted a estimate of, whether it is possible to be produced at the Defendant Company regarding the supply of treatment construction, produced one set of vehicle number recognition machine, one set of blocking machine, and transferred it to G, etc. on April 18, 2014.

E. On October 13, 2014, the Defendant Company entered into a formal contract with the Defendant Company to supply parking-related facilities, including treatment construction and vehicle inspection equipment, vehicle number recognition equipment, departure warning lights, street blocking equipment, parking management computer, in-house warning, etc., and around May 2015, the Defendant Company began to supply goods under the said contract to treatment construction side.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, 27, Eul evidence Nos. 13 and 14, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the parties’ assertion is ① the Defendant’s supply contract for the E- Apartment Main Loan Facility (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) to the Plaintiff.