The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants were candidates for the non-permanent directors of the E-agricultural cooperative implemented on January 24, 2014.

No person shall engage in an election campaign other than distributing official electoral bulletin in connection with the election of directors.

1. Notwithstanding Defendant A, the Defendant, at around 13:37 January 16, 2014, calls from the Defendant’s house located in the Southernnam-gun F, to G of the E Agriculture Cooperative, an elector, at the seat of the Defendant’s house located in the Namnam-gunF, and calls for an election of directors.

An election campaign is carried out in a way other than distributing the election campaign bulletin by asserting 44 electors by telephone for support from 60 times from that time to January 23, 2014, including appeal for support by stating that “.......”

2. Defendant B

A. Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 10:04 on January 17, 2014, phone called from the Defendant’s home located in the Namnam-gun H to I to the representatives of E Agriculture Cooperatives, an elector, to “to request the election of directors.”

An election campaign is conducted in a way other than distributing the election campaign bulletin by filing an appeal for support with 50 voters on a total of 76 occasions from that time to January 23, 2014, by stating that “.....”

B. Nevertheless, at around January 20, 2014, the Defendant’s office around January 16:26, 2014 to the J of E Agriculture Cooperatives, an elector, at the above Defendant’s office.

F. B.C.

The representative's opportunity to use only one representation of the representative's novel shall be set up.

I shall audit and inspect.

‘The transmission of text messages to 51 representatives, etc., carried out an election campaign by transmitting text messages to the total of 51 representatives in a way other than distributing election campaign bulletins.

2. In the case of the Ba 62 on November 24, 2016, the Constitutional Court: (a) provides that the election campaign stipulated in Article 50(4) of the former Agricultural Cooperative Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013; (b) No. 12755, Jun. 11, 2014; and (c) no election campaign stipulated in Article 50(4) of the former Agricultural Cooperative Act (amended by Act No. 12755, Mar. 31, 2011); and (d) the former Agricultural Cooperative Act (amended by Act No. 1050, Mar. 31, 2011