Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

From March 4, 2015 to July 15, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 190,00 from the above E in order to enter the said place of business as a customer to the said place of business around July 15, 2015, from the trade name “D” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by B, from March 4, 2015 to July 15, 2015. The Defendant, despite being aware of the act of arranging sexual traffic with F, deemed the said place of business as a carter.

G announced the above E at the seat to the room of the above 304 room, which is a woman with sexual traffic, and Defendant I was in charge of cleaning and arranging the above business at the time.

The J, from the outside of the above businesses, carried out the so-called “a gate,” which sees the network of regulating the police by using electricity free of charge.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B, F, G, I, and J to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police officer in relation to E, H, G, F, J, I, and B;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. On-site enforcement photographs and copies of books;

1. The CD (D CCTV images) (the Defendant was unaware of whether the instant marina business establishment was a sexual traffic business establishment;

The argument is asserted.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the business place of this case used J-free electricity and took a role of liaison in preparation for the police control, and in particular, the defendant divided emergency labels under the Kaman's control, and notified the women in the business place of control.

Comprehensively taking account of the above circumstances, the Defendant may recognize the fact that the instant business establishment was engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic in collusion with B, F, etc. while working as a carbr employee as stated in the facts of the crime, knowing that it was a sexual traffic

Defendant’s assertion is rejected

Application of Statutes

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act.