logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.02 2018고단1117
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and two months, Defendant B’s imprisonment, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of two million won, respectively.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From June 21, 2017 to August 9, 2017, a person who operated an officetel entertainment business under the name of "H" in the former Gtel 505 and 401, such as "H", in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, from June 21, 2017 to "H", and Defendant B is a person who worked as the head of the office for the said period at the said business, and Defendant C is an employee of the said entertainment business establishment.

1. Defendant A and B

A. On June 2017, the Defendants violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) offered funds to operate a commercial sex business establishment by leasing officetels and providing funds to operate a business establishment. Defendant B recruited to operate a commercial sex business establishment by advertising a business establishment, customer solicitation, etc.

Accordingly, from June 21, 2017 to August 9, 2017, the Defendants posted an advertisement on the Internet site "I", etc., while operating a commercial entertainment business in the instant officetel, and provided 70,000 won to an unspecified number of customers who have been found as telephone reservation in return for commercial sex acts and provided 150,000 won from 70,000 won to 150,000 won in return for commercial sex acts, and arranged commercial sex acts by having all female members, such as the above Defendant C, who are waiting in the said officetel, do sexual intercourse with customers.

B. On August 8, 2017, when a police control was conducted in the course of operating the said commercial sex acts around August 21:40, 2017, Defendant A, who is also assisted by forgery of private documents, the event of the said investigation document, the offender, and the offender, was informed of the fact of crackdown by telephone to Defendant B, and Party B was to be investigated into the actual owner of the business. The Seoul Regional Police Agency made a false statement to the police officer in charge of the Seoul Regional Police Agency’s living order and J, and made a false statement to the same effect, and the following day was to undergo an investigation by having a lease agreement of 505 an officetel, which is a place of commercial sex acts, and was present at the said office.

Defendant

A As such, the offender is also easy to avoid the act, and the actual Ftel No. 505 is written as "K," not B, to the lessee of the lease agreement.

arrow