A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2012, around 00:30 on August 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol on a restaurant in front of the cafeteria “Daido” located in the north-gu Death-dong at the port; (b) took the bate test while taking the bate part of the said car, and was locked by taking the bridge back with the pent part of the said car; and (c) was locked on the driver’s seat.

Although there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from a slope D belonging to the Police Station of the Port Guard of the Korea Coast Guard, which was dispatched after receiving a report to the effect that the said car obstructed on the road, and the Defendant was demanded to comply with the drinking test four times from 02:40 on the same day to 03:16 on the same day, the Defendant did not comply with the said demand while the Defendant did not drive the said car, but driven by E, who is a woman living together,.

2. At around 10:00 on August 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) heard the fact that the Defendant was under suspicion as referred to in the above paragraph (1) at the port north-west Police Station C police box located in the north-gu, North Korea at port; and (b) told E, a female living together, of the Defendant, who was living together, of the Defendant, to the effect that “I will not refuse to take a alcohol test; (c) I would like to make a false statement to the effect that “I would have driven a vehicle other than the Defendant.”

Accordingly, around 17:49 on August 10, 2012, E stated to the effect that “E driven a B Mete car at around 00:30 on August 5, 2012.”

As a result, the defendant instigated E to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Investigation report (investigation into On-the-spot situations, etc.) and investigation report (the results of mobile analysis of suspect mobile phones).