A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.149% at around 01:35 on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (SM5) and proceeded along the four-lane road in front of the “in-port airbrance shooting range” located in the north-gu Office of Posi-gu at the port of port by driving the BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.149% on May 22, 2013; (b) while driving the four-lane road from the right edge to the right edge distance from the right edge to the right edge distance from the right edge of the Defendant’s vehicle during the signal waiting, the Defendant was found to be unable to immediately drive the said vehicle and tried to control the drunk driving.

A person engaged in driving of motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely drive motor vehicles by taking the front side and left side well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and tried to drive the said vehicle to the right part of the said patrol vehicle after moving the said vehicle to avoid the crackdown on drinking alcohol such as the victim D slope, etc., and shocked to the right part of the said patrol vehicle with the left part of the said patrol vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the right shoulder, which requires treatment for about two weeks. Although the Defendant destroyed the victim’s patrol vehicle owned by the Republic of Korea to take repair costs equivalent to KRW 4,1540,00, the Defendant escaped without immediately stopping and checking the damage situation, and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time and time as the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, from the road front of the “Korean official,” located in the north-gu death zone at port, to the road front of the “Seoul-dong apartment” located in the same Gu, the Defendant driven BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content 0.149% while under the influence of alcohol content.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;