logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.10.17 2014고단2180
전기사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to four months from the Cheongju District Court to imprisonment for an attempted larceny of a structure at night, and completed the execution of the sentence on July 24, 201.

At around 02:30 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) cut the electric wires 3, which are the electrical facilities for the electricity business owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation; (b) cut the wires 3, the electric poles listed above and cut up to the cable 3, the electric poles listed above, thereby damaging the total of 267 meters of the market price by damaging the electric wires equivalent to the total of 1,321,650 won; and (c) cutting the wires 131m of the electric wires worth 648,450 won in the market price into E Ept XG car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. A written statement;

1. A budgetary statement, field investigation, etc. of power distribution works;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and current status of personal identification;

1. Relevant Article 100 (1) 1 of the Electric Utility Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 100 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders is the time the defendant commits the crime, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, and the defendant's father and descendant do not have good health, but the defendant has been sentenced one time to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and one time to suspend the execution of the sentence, and the crime of this case is committed during the period of repeated crime, as indicated in the order, shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant committed

arrow