1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of part of medical care for official duties rendered to the Plaintiff on May 28, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 16, 2015, the Plaintiff, who had worked as Thai Fire Station B, was diagnosed as having scambling a fire inside the building by sending it to the fire site around 16:30 on the 16:30th of March, 2015, and was diagnosed as having scambling it, applied for approval of medical treatment for official duties to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff applied for approval of medical treatment on the part of the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff was confirmed to have scambling base, salt fright, the scambling base, the left-hand scambling base, the left-hand scambling base, 2-3 to 4-5 between both sides, scambing-3, 4-5, and 4-5.

B. On May 28, 2015, the Defendant approved medical treatment for official duties as to “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise 2-3, 4-5 on both sides, sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate satise sate sate satum, both sides, and left-hand satum satum satise sate satum,” but there was no causal link between official duties and public duties (this case’s upper satum satise satum satum satum.).

(C) The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee, but the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee rendered a decision to dismiss the request for review on October 30, 2015. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including paper numbers, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by the instant accident or the Plaintiff’s official duty for 33 years.