logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.07.15 2019구단10826
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 7, 2017, the Plaintiff was an employee retired from office on December 31, 2016, when performing the work of maintaining the processing plant in the processing department B, and was receiving medical treatment on the part of the processing department’s pre-processing plant. On December 7, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for the Defendant on December 4, 2018, with the approval of “the instant approved disease” (hereinafter “the instant approved disease”). The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the further approval on the part of the pre-processing department’s re-management, which was the common pre-determination of the right-hand supervisor, infection outside the upper right-hand supervisor, common pre-determination of the left-hand supervisor, external side of the left-hand supervisor, external side of the left-hand supervisor, external side of the back-hand side, external high-frequency of the side, external high-speed and external high-frequency of the left-hand side of the instant case (hereinafter “the instant approved disease”).

B. On January 29, 2019, the Defendant issued a disposition of additional injury and disease approval to the Plaintiff on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship in view of the fact that the upper and the left-hand slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive slive sliveslives

C. On August 14, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application for first medical treatment to the Defendant again, and the Defendant, on December 17, 2019, acknowledged the Plaintiff’s occupational disease on the ground that there was a proximate causal relation with the pertinent work, and recognized the Plaintiff’s medical treatment. On the other hand, “the first half of the first half of the first half of the margin on the opposite side” did not become a superior disease, and “the second half of the second half of the second half of the front side, the second half of the second half of the front side, the second half of the second half of the front side, the second half of the second half of the front side, the second half of the front side, and the second half of the front side, the second half of the second half of the front side, and the second half of the front side of the front side are the superior disease, but the lower age is insignificant, rather than the occupational factor.

arrow