1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From February 16, 1981 to June 30, 2018, the Plaintiff worked as auxiliary coal support department, digging aids, digging galleries, engine drivers, etc. in the Korea Coal Corporation B mining center (hereinafter “instant business site”).

B. On July 6, 2018, at C Hospital located in the East Sea-si, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “spawn / injury-disease in the part of the spawn spawn spawn : The spawn spawn spawn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn swn

C. On July 31, 2018, the Plaintiff: “In the instant workplace, the Plaintiff caused an occupational disease by performing duties that may be borne by the checks, supervision, and slots between 36 and 7 months at the instant workplace”; and (b) the Plaintiff was the Defendant.

Each of the diagnosis names in paragraph 4 was applied for the first medical care benefits by applying for the injury or disease (hereinafter “each of the instant injury or disease”). D.

The defendant advisory opinion presented a medical opinion on August 1, 2018 that "each of the claims of this case is recognized."

E. On September 14, 2018, the Seoul Occupational Disease Determination Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Determination Committee”) rendered a judgment as follows on each of the instant claimed soldiers on the basis of the medical records for each of the instant claimed soldiers, and the Plaintiff’s duties performed at the instant workplace.

In the case of an application for the judgment, the term “in the case of this case’s approved injury and disease” means occupational disease under Article 37(1)2 of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (hereinafter “In the case of this case’s approved injury and disease”), the term “in the case of this case’s approved injury and disease, the part of the front part of the back part of the shoulder, the left part of the back part of the shoulder, the left part of the shoulder collision, the left part of the shoulder collision, and the term “in the case of this case’s non-approved injury and disease” (hereinafter “in the case’s non-approved injury and disease”) is non-occupational disease.

The reasons for the decision are the non-approval injury of this case - the plaintiff's MI award.