logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.13 2019나23823
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Part 1 to 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to or after the addition as follows:

In accordance with the above evidence, the plaintiff was also at the time when the driver's view is limited or adjacent, etc., and there was an error of crossinging the main road of six-lanes from the center to the right right earlier at the time when the driver's view is interfered with by light of light, etc., and such error shall be deemed to have a significant cause for the occurrence of the accident and the expansion of damage. Therefore, the defendant's liability shall be limited to 40% by taking this into account. The "attached Form 1 Calculation Table" in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the "attached Form 1 Calculation Table" in the judgment of the trial.

The following basic matters shall be cited as “basic matters on the calculation of the amount of damages” in attached Table 1, and the list of 14 at the end of the first instance judgment shall be deleted.

The fourth five parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance (including the table) shall be followed by the following six parallels (including the table):

Since urology and appraisal of the first instance court recognized the nursing only during the framework period, and judged that the urology and appraisal of urology are not in need of urology, the urology and appraisal of urology are limited to the necessity of urology due to urology and disorder. Since urology and appraisal after the completion date of urology are recognized only after the completion date of urology, the rate of 10% of the total disability shall be applied until the completion date of urology and the urology shall be calculated by applying 30% of the urology and then the urology shall be calculated by applying 4th to 8th through 9th class of the first instance judgment of "6,90,520 won" as shown in the following table. However, the Plaintiff claimed for the payment of 9,513,630 won at the expense of urology, the purchase cost, transportation cost, and the payment of the nursing expense, among the household products made by the Defendant.

arrow