logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.19 2018나78451
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall be revoked, and the revoked part shall be applicable.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which added or added the damages calculation table, shall be replaced by the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The 3th to 20th of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

According to the statements in the evidence Nos. 4 and 5 of "B. Haghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

“2) Of the 227,844,610 won paid by the Defendant to the deceased’s medical expenses, the Defendant’s contributory portion (30%) 68,353,383 of the first instance judgment of the deceased’s 12 to 15 of the 15th instance judgment of the deceased’s contributory portion (30%) was committed as follows.

If the deceased's property damage is deducted from the amount of criminal agreement and the amount of contributory portion of the deceased's negligence, such as the statement in the paragraph, property.

arrow