logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.22 2019나16559
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant exceeding the following amount of money ordered to be paid to the plaintiff A.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. A statement of calculation of damages in the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance, which added or added, shall be replaced by the attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The fourth two cases of the judgment of the first instance are " July 23, 2069" as "the average life expectancy of the 19-year-old women pursuant to the life table near the date of the instant accident" on April 27, 2069 [the average life expectancy of the 19-year-old women pursuant to the life table of 2014, which is close to the date of the instant accident, is 6.41 years, and the reduced life expectancy of the Plaintiff A is presumed to be 52.20 years from the date of appraisal (=66.41 years x 78.6%)." The 7th sentence is deemed to be 65 years of age, respectively.

The 4th to 5th parallel parallels of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

The plaintiff asserts that the rate of loss of labor ability due to the loss of the right hand under Part III-A-3 of Mabrid Disability Assessment Table shall also be included in 12% of the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table. The part II of Mabrid Disability Assessment Table is related to the qualitative disease of the mid-tour boundary, and the part II of Mabrid Disability Assessment Table is related to each other, including the neutic or mental disorder as well as the physical disorder, and indicates the grade of the latter disability (see Supreme Court Decision 97Da28988 delivered on Nov. 28, 1997). In addition, the Mabrid Disability Assessment Table cannot be determined on the basis of similar provisions when there is no relevant provision. In addition, the part III of Mabrid Disability Disability Assessment Table can be determined on the basis of a similar provision, and in the case of a physical disability from the point of view of not less than two harm if it might be caused by the other than the mental disorder.

arrow