logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울고등법원 2010. 11. 3. 선고 2010누11520 판결
[이주대책대상자및이주대책보상등의거부처분취소][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Lee Sung-hwan et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Goyang market (Law Firm TelbS, Attorney Lee Dong-hwan, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 29, 2010

The first instance judgment

Suwon District Court Decision 2009Guhap2912 Decided March 16, 2010

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on August 7, 2009, such as those subject to relocation measures and compensation for relocation measures, shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) the court ordered “ August 24, 2007” under Section 7 of Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance to “ August 24, 2006,” and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the removal of the entire 8th page 4, and therefore, (c) the same shall be cited under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Yellow-gu (Presiding Judge)

arrow