Plaintiff (Law Firm Suwon, Attorneys Kim Young-hoon et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

The Minister of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs (Attorney Park Jong-jin, Counsel for defendant)

September 29, 2010

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2009Guhap9260 decided April 30, 2010

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

On March 3, 2009, the defendant revoked the one-month measure of suspending the qualification of doctor against the plaintiff.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasons why a member should explain this case are as follows: (a) the last sentence of Article 2-3(1) of the Reasons for the Judgment of the court of first instance (No. 8, 15); and (b) the facts of recognition as follows (No. 8, 16) are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding evidence No. 30 to [the grounds for recognition] (No. 8, 16]; and (c) therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the

“(14) The Prosecutor appealed, but the Seoul High Court dismissed the Prosecutor’s appeal on July 16, 2010 on each portion of the acquittal of Nonparty 1, 2, and 3 (No. 2010No676).”

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Yellow-gu (Presiding Judge)