Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the head of the C church in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was in conflict with the victim D, who is a member of the church in connection with the church affairs.

1. On September 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conspired with the pastor E of the above church on September 5, 2013, in collusion with the above church members; (b) sent to the representatives of the F Assembly by Doc request for the general assembly for several minutes of the general assembly; and (c) there was no unexpected question between the victim and the female house manager at the time; (d) the victim was irrelevant to the above written book; (b) the victim resigned from the post to leave the church and the relevant members did not confirm the correct factual relations; (c) even though the Defendant did not confirm the correct factual relations, there was a big spread of the French writing with D and D in the church where D pastor had been employed before the above inducement; and (d) many of these members left the church; and (d) eventually, (e) the victim resigned from D church and did not know that he did not hold his office for five years without his term of office.

D became aware that the above information was true as a result of the verification to the members of the previous church and to the members of several pastors;

② D, which was likely to bring about the evidence proving the margin, did not find the lower time thereafter.

The honor of the victim D was damaged by openly stating the fact that the victim " was openly false."

2. The Defendant of defamation around July 7, 2014, in collusion with the above E on July 7, 2014, shall create a thickness of the total gents of the general assembly where he exists.

“Preparation of inducements under the title of “” and delivery to representatives of the F Assembly, did not have been confirmed as the strings between the victim and female house owners at the time, and even if the Defendant did not verify accurate facts, the dispute between C church sex and D employed in disguised fraud with the said inducements.

D The problem of his cans and criminal acts of false resumes.