A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2018, the Defendant was assaulted on the front of the “C convenience store” located in Silung-si B at Silung-si on February 03:15, 2018, on the ground that the Defendant was served with the Defendant’s 112 report, and was served to the E, etc. belonging to Silung-si Police Station Down-si, who was sent to the said place late arrival, and on the ground that the Defendant “scop and d

“................” and “p.s.

The term “satise” refers to a large sound, and assaulted the battop of the above E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect of the defendant, and the absence of criminal records exceeding the fine);