A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2015, 04:20 around 04:20 on the road in front of the Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant observed that the police officer E belonging to the Dong District of the Si-gu Police Station D, who sent to the site after receiving a 112 report on the assault case on the front of the Gyeonggi-do, sent a bath to F who is the seat of the Defendant, putting him off the wall to the drinking, putting him off the door, putting him off the door, and gets off the window of the patrol car on the drinking, and then, the Defendant “Woo kk kb kb kb kb kb

In doing so, I am blick blick blick blick, and blicked, as we can blick to the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of CCTV image CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is to recognize and reflect the facts of the instant crime.

The degree of violence seems relatively minor.

In addition, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and theories of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by considering the following factors.