A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2017, the Defendant was arguinging about the issue of her child and her child in the Defendant’s residence located in Singu-si, 2017. On November 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported 112, and reported 112, and reported her to her to her to her to enter the ward in a new state; (b) her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to she her

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that it is against the law, that it seems that it is likely to be contingent, and that the family members of the defendant appeal the fleet, etc.).