logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단3732
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 3732"

1. The Defendant, on May 15, 201, was aware of the fraud of the Victim’s Korean Card Co., Ltd., within Q2, run by P in Daegu Suwon-gu P around May 15, 2017.

P, “The amount of money to be received from our card companies on credit card solicitation days is KRW 25 million, and the bank account in the name of bad credit standing is unable to receive money, and the account, identification card, etc. is different,” and the account number in P was identified.

The Defendant, by using the account number in the name of P, copy of P’s resident registration certificate, official certificate, etc. as above on the same day, was carried out as if the Defendant was P, and was given a loan of KRW 15 million to the account in the name of P from the injured party, and received KRW 14 million from the above P to the community credit cooperative account in the name of P.

2. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as the above paragraph 1, committed the following acts: (a) around May 17, 2017, the Defendant: (b) around the victim LAW Co., Ltd., by using the victim’s account number and P’s resident registration certificate; (c) a copy of P’s resident registration certificate; and (d) a certificate of official approval; (b) took out a loan of KRW 3 million from the victim’s account in the name of P; and (c) was remitted from the above P to the Defendant’s above Saemaul bank account.

The Defendant supplied and became aware of the past parts of the vehicle in the past, and had the Defendant receive a loan from a lending company, such as the victim R’s personal information and mobile phone, and Korean card company, etc. using the mobile phone, and had the Defendant receive a loan from the said R’s name as if the Defendant was the said R, and had the said R transfer the loan to the said R’s account, and had the said R receive a loan as if the amount was erroneously remitted to the said R.

Defendant, on July 201, 201

arrow