Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) operated for a reservation customer on the road near the exit of 1042 m3:45 U.S. at the center of Mangsan-dong-gu, U.S., U.S., 1042 200 m20 m20 m.; (b) was forced to board a victim C taxi which was waiting for a locking signal; and (c) the Defendant was ordered to demand a discharge because he/she was a reserved taxi from the damaged person; and (d) even upon receipt of a request

It is why it refuses to take passengers or not.

“I am son,” and “I am son, I am son, I am son, and I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, and I am son. I am son. I am son. I am son.

“In doing so, he did not get off the taxi for about 10 minutes, and obstructed the said victim’s taxi business by force by force, without getting off the taxi for about 10 minutes.

2. On November 2, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties by the police officer, who was requested to present identification cards from the EthicalF belonging to the police station in the Dong-dong Police Station in Japan, where the Defendant was 112, while 1042 francing a pedal at the 5th Do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police of F, G, or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographs (Evidence No. 15, 6 pages);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (a violation of duties), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a violation of interference with the performance of public duties), the selection of fines (a violation of the provision of a fine in 2010) (a violation of the provision of a fine in addition to fines of KRW 300,000,000, and there are no other serious criminal records: Provided, That a crime interfering with the performance of public duties needs to be strictly punished, and the amount of fines shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant's collection of office in

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.