A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s business on the roads of the Doki apartment apartment in Busan, Seodong-gu, Busan; (b) interfered with the Defendant’s business by force on the 40 minutes of the victim’s taxi business by driving the Dopo-gu operated by the victim C with a large volume of customers without any justifiable reason; (c) by driving the Dopo-si with the Dopo-gu operated by the victim C in the Dopo-gu; and (d) by failing to pay the fee, even after having arrived at the Dopo-gu, Busan, Busan; and (d) by failing to pay the fee, the Defendant interfered with the Dopo-gu’s taxi business by force.

2. Around 23:25 on the same day as paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) 23:25 of the same day; (b) 112 on the road in Busan, the Busan, the Busan, Police Station E District, and the police station in the Busan, which received a 112 report and demanded for calculating and returning the fare to a taxi; (c) she was arrested as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with the duties by leaving the taxi without getting off the taxi, and (d) she was arrested as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with the duties by failing to get off the taxi, and assaulted twice to the left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officials concerning 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of damaged photographs and the Acts and subordinate statutes on the part of the defendant's mast photograph;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Category 1 (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) (Interference with the Execution of Official Duties) is the basic area (six months to one year and six months), and there is no special sentencing factor;

(b) interference with activities of Type 2 (Interference with Duties).