Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her business: (a) at the “E restaurant operated by the victim D (M, 61 years old) located in U.S. Dong-dong C (M, 03:00 on August 22, 2017; (b) the Defendant “E” restaurant that was located in the restaurant; (c)

C. The gushes the gushes the gushes the gushes, the Si expenses, and the head of the Gu collected plastic chairs outside the above restaurant to park the parked vehicle, and continuously interfered with the operation of the above restaurant by force of the victimized person by avoiding disturbance for about one hour during the time of drinking, such as continuing to place a free window on drinking.

2. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and was injured by the Defendant, at the criminal team office of the Sinsan-dong Police Station located in the Donsan-dong Police Station located in the 1338 Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (39 years of age). In order to hand over the Defendant to a police officer who belongs to the above police station, the Defendant was suffering from the Defendant’s arms and legss of the face put about about two weeks

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the transfer of personal duties, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, D, and H;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 314 (1), Article 257 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business), Article 314 (1), Article 257 (1), and Article 136 (1) of the same Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to crimes of injury and interference with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good for each of the crimes in this case, but the defendant has no same record, and agree with the victim of interference with business.