(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.03.31 2012가단5511

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.03.31 2012가단5511

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff A KRW 210,864,860, and KRW 5,000,000 to the Plaintiff B, and KRW 1,50,000 each to the Plaintiff C and D, and each of them.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E refers to the FKaren car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) around 00:10 on February 28, 201, around 00:10.

) While driving a motor vehicle and driving a motor vehicle in front of the daily motor vehicle trading complex in front of the traffic zone in the middle-gu, South-gu, South-gu, the area is adjacent to the intersection where yellow lights are destroyed, etc., and as a crosswalk was placed in the front section, the plaintiff Gap, who was crossinging the road to the right side of the left side of the vehicle due to negligence when he neglected his duty of care to see the front side and the left side of the vehicle in the front section of the said vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff Company A suffered injury, such as the Defendant’s wife, the Plaintiff C, and D’s children, due to the instant accident. The Plaintiff suffered injury from the Defendant’s wife, the Plaintiff’s C, and the Plaintiff’s children.

The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, and evidence 7 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of this case.

C. According to the evidence and the purport of the entire argument as seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, the plaintiff A also needs to cross the road according to the crosswalk, without properly examining the surrounding areas, and crossing the road by crossinging the crosswalk with a large line. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff A's negligence is deemed to have caused the occurrence of the accident in this case and the expansion of damage. Thus, the scope of the defendant's liability is limited to 90% in consideration of this.

2. It shall be in addition to the matters stated separately below the scope of liability for damages.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.02.17 2015나6379

-대구지방법원포항지원 2014.09.02 2013가단10657

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2015가단5343745

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2014가단5235106

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.22 2016가단5123450