1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4,000,000 to Plaintiff A, respectively, and KRW 2,00,000,000 to Plaintiff C and D; and (b) respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The recognition 1) E is the F Costaex Corres (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 19:40 on December 4, 2013.

) A driving his/her vehicle and driving his/her vehicle, and his/her co-operal road in front of the H Hospital located in G in G in G in G Kimhae-si, who was crossing the crosswalk from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant vehicle to the right side of the Defendant vehicle while driving along the vehicle by a showle screen from the screen surface to the screen screen. (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as the malone’s pulmonary frame.

3) Plaintiff C and D met with Plaintiff A’s parent, Plaintiff B, and the Defendant was an insurer who entered into an insurance contract for the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant is a local government that manages pedestrian signal apparatus at the instant accident. According to the recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant vehicle. (C) At the time when the instant accident occurred, Plaintiff A, who was under the age of 11 (year 6) did not turn red light on the pedestrian signal apparatus (No. 13, No. 11, No. 34) but was waiting for left-hand turn turn-hand turn-hand turn-off (No. 13, No. 11, No. 134). Plaintiff A was found to have been on the instant accident. However, it erred by failing to exhaust the crosswalk at the time of the instant accident, taking into account the following factors: the pedestrian color report by the Plaintiff’s parents at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff’s 1 to 3% evidence No. 81, the Plaintiff’s 1 to 281, and 2, etc.

2. The scope of liability for damages is below.