1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 12,936,747, and KRW 2,00,000 and each of the said money, the Defendant shall start from December 24, 2014 to December 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C are D cab around 10:15 on December 24, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) A driving a vehicle, driving a vehicle, and driving a vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle in question.

(2) Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s wife, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 13, Eul evidence 4, the purport of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant, who is a mutual aid business operator for the defendant's vehicle, is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) the Plaintiff, as well as A, was negligent in crossing the road by driving the crosswalk to which pedestrians need to move along; (b) while driving the crosswalk to the point where the direction of the Defendant’s driving direction was passed; and (c) the error by the Plaintiff A caused the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, and thus, the amount of damages that the Defendant is liable to compensate is determined.