1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On May 21, 2009, the Plaintiff was employed by Nonparty B (hereinafter “B”) as a gas air, and was under contact with the head, etc., and received medical treatment from the Defendant until September 15, 2009, with the Defendant, by suffering from the upper disease of “the head part” (hereinafter “instant accident”) of “the head part from damage, brain salvine, salvine, salvine, salvine, salked salt, salvine, and bones, salvines of bones, and salvines of bones, etc.

B. Afterwards, the Plaintiff diagnosed “non-high-frequency cerebrovassis, high blood pressure, nephasis, and chronic kidne diseases (hereinafter “the instant injury”)” and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on April 25, 2012.

C. On June 22, 2012, the Defendant rejected the application for medical care benefits on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation with his/her duties as an individual disease that could occur regardless of his/her performance of duties.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

On November 7, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a request for review against this, but the claim was dismissed, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee filed a request for review to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on April 3, 2013, but the request for review was dismissed.

【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 7, 8, Gap evidence 19, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In light of the fact that the “non-frequency cerebral tension” occurred on May 21, 2009, which was the time when the instant accident occurred, close to the point of time on May 21, 2009, and on June 5, 2009, there is a proximate causal relation between the instant accident and the instant cerebral tension. (2) From December 26, 2008 to May 21, 2009, the Plaintiff carried out the work of manufacturing and installing steel structure and installing steel structure in C and B and its contact with each other. The work site was located within a long distance, such as the Shisung-gun, Gisung, Goung-gun, Goung-gun, and Eup, and it was required for considerable time to commute to and from work, while carrying out the work in neighboring in the workplace.