1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above part is revoked.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was dispatched to the dial-a-related maritime company as an employee and carried out B-related drawings and computer work.

B. On November 27, 2014, at around 15:05, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”) at the Busan 00 Hospital, and was diagnosed as “self-cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spa.

C. On December 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease with the Defendant. On March 26, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the instant injury and the business was not recognized.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that there was a proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s occupational duties, since the instant injury and stress was caused by occupational excessive stress or the existing disease aggravated beyond natural progress due to occupational exaggeration and stress, and thus, the instant disposition was unlawful on a different basis.

B. A) On November 3, 2000, the Plaintiff entered a dial-a-related corporation, Inc., and dispatched it to the Treatment Shipbuilding Marine Co., Ltd., and performed B-related drawings and computer work in the Treatment Shipbuilding C.

B. If it is impossible to perform the work in accordance with the installation drawings, or if a request for information correction is made at the work site due to reasons such as the omission in the installation drawings, etc., the Plaintiff’s main work is to electronically input the modified information in consultation with the design manager, so that it can be conducted without interruptions in B on the facilities.